Should HillBuzz be moved to the left side of DailyPUMA? I'm open to suggestions.

I used to welcome HillBuzz's articles when they just made logical, pro puma points. Whether or not HillBuzz was PUMA, they had important information to share. HillBuzz also genuinely seems to like Hillary Clinton. However, you can't like and respect a politician while dissing their closest supporters and allies, which HillBuzz has now started to do on a regular basis.

HillBuzz has now crossed over to total moderate conservative republican idealogy. While HillBuzz still professes to be supporters of Hillary Clinton, it would be unrealistic to see their future support for Hillary Clinton helping her, especially after they advocated the ouster of every democratic congress person, even the democrats that supported Hillary Clinton in 2008.

I believe removing the rotting head of the democratic party, Reid and Pelosi, is most important of all, yet Hillbuzz has not stated this as a goal. I find this very disturbing that HillBuzz would prefer to oust all democrats when just ousting the most vocal anti Hillary Clinton politicians would send a clear and loud message.

HillBuzz supporting Hillary Clinton in the future would be like Fox News supporting Hillary Clinton. While Hillbuzz appears to be pretty popular, they clearly are going after the moderate conservative crowd at the expense of Hillary Clinton supporters, and that is sad to see.

It is pretty obvious that HillBuzz will be supporting Sarah Palin for 2012. No matter what Hillary Clinton does for 2012 HillBuzz has already said and done things that will make any future support they may have for Hillary Clinton may look "polarizing" to traditional democrats in 2012.

Maybe Cannonfire had a point when mentioning accusations made by others that HillBuzz was being funded by conservative groups.

DailyPUMA will probably move HillBuzz to the left side column. Unfortunately, there is not enough room to bring the left column up to the top of the page, which means one will have to hunt for their blog.

I think HillBuzz was also the first to mention that Bill Clinton was in the hospital so DailyPUMA may lose part of what it is supposed to do, which is get out eclectic news about politics and Hillary Clinton as fast and efficiently as possible, if HillBuzz is moved to the left side column.

On the other hand, you can sign up for automatic HillBuzz email alerts whenever they release a spicy new article. DailyPUMA is open to other viewpoints on this topic, but for now it seems like Hillbuzz should be moved to the left side of DailyPUMA, no?

The Brilliance of Sarah Palin's Turkey Interview is once again Attacked by MSNBC, to the glee of their Gullible Minions.

Sarah Palin is brilliant.

Palin's interview at the Turkey Processing Plant was an uncomfortably beautiful thing to observe. If it made you uncomfortable to see Sarah Palin going on in a pleasant manner in the foreground while in the background Turkeys are being killed, the point is, YOU SHOULD FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE, and, IT IS REALITY.

According to MSNBC, it is Sarah Palin who was the fool, who didn't know better, and just let herself be videotaped with the background as it was. What MSNBC is in denial about is that this interview forces us to look at ourselves.

This is who we are. Can someone explain why it is "acceptable" to sit around the Thanksgiving dinner table, eating turkey, while talking about our social calendar? How is that any different than what Sarah Palin did?

At least Sarah Palin was showing it like it is, this is a part of our economy. Palin's immersion into her environment so that the entire scene MUST be viewed as inseparable, is the mark of a true artist. Is MSNBC's position that Sarah Palin is a fool for wanting to show everybody the truth about what goes on in a Turkey processing plant?

If it makes you uncomfortable to see Turkeys being killed in the background, don't allow MSNBC to manipulate your feelings into somehow thinking it's Sarah Palin who is to blame. There is no blame, the story here is society kill animals and eats them, to try and spin that message into this being about Sarah Palin is to insult the death of those animals.

Somebody in the animal movement once said to me, "If people didn't eat all of these turkeys, the turkeys would never be raised and they wouldn't exist at all in the first place". They were just pointing out the irony that if people didn't eat so much turkey for Thanksgiving, those Turkeys would never exist at all. Even though they abhorred Thanksgiving, they realized that without Thanksgiving, 70 million turkeys might never have lived at all.

How can one accurately judge how barbaric it is to create animal life for the purpose of food consumption when the alternative is to not create that animal life at all, especially if the animals are treated respectfully while they live?