Two names that I have not forgotten from the 2008 democratic presidential nomination race are Dave "Mudcat" Saunders and Chris Kofinis. Both of these hugely integrated John Edwards campaign staff members staunchly attacked Hillary Clinton during their own appearances on MSNBC and CNN.
Here is a quote from Dave "Mudcat" Saunders that I took right off the airwaves back in 2008 just after John Edwards resigned from the 2008 democratic nomination race...
"I will do everything within my power so Edwards doesn't endorse Hillary Clinton" -Dave "Mudcat" Saunders.
Not to be outdone by Saunders, Chris Kofinis denied any and all knowledge of anything to do with John Edwards and his baby daddy situation or the affair that led to Edwards fathering a child.
Maybe Kofinis did not know, but Kofinis had such an integral position in the Edwards campaign that it would seem that he might have been confided in in regards to Edward's secrets.
Kofinis stated on MSNBC that he had no knowledge of the Edwards affair even though he was communications director of the Edwards campaign!
When do the actions of Edwards supporters spill over into an admission that Hillary Clinton was wrongly attacked by those hiding John Edward's secrets?
When does a grand jury investigation take a position on the ability of a wounded political campaign to continue to take pot shots at another democratic rival in exchange for remaining on payroll even after secretly knowing their own candidate cannot win and will be resigning?
Does not such a conflicted position create political pundits on a payroll using their positions to wound another candidacy simply because they have nothing else to lose but a paycheck to gain?
Shouldn't the threat of jail time be an added incentive to cease and desist talking negatively about competing political rivals if their own candidate can no longer win because of their own actions?
Will Kofinis and Saunders be investigated to see if they continued with political attacks against democratic rivals even after they knew their own candidate's own behavior had torpedo'd any chance of becoming the democratic presidential nominee in 2008?
If Kofinis and Saunders had any knowledge of Edwards actions, and still attacked a fellow democratic rival in exchange for being on Edward's payroll, are their actions any different than what John Edwards did?
No comments:
Post a Comment