Is the Public being duped by Roman Polanski?

The actual plea bargain that the judge in the Roman Polanski case first agreed to back in the 70's, and then changed his mind about, was nothing more than a slap on the wrist.

Is it possible the the "controversy" over whether or not Mr. Polanski will be extradited from France to the U.S. is nothing more than a cover to get Mr. Polanksi the old deal that the judge took away?

What if one of Polanski's attorneys were to say at a press conference, "It was a tough negotiation, but we got Mr. Polanski to agree to the original plea bargain that the judge initially imposed, Mr. Polanski agrees to waive extradition and come back to the United States."

Would that really be justice?

I believe it would be a real slap in the face that in no way fits the alleged crime that occurred If Mr. Polanski were to only receive the original plea bargain that was taken off the table, presumably taken off the table because it was way too soft.

Luring a 13 year old to Jack Nicholson's home under the guise of taking photos to further her possibly budding model career, and then allegedly raping her, even after she says no, has to have jail time associated with it.

What if Mr. Polanski had actually kept true to his word and taken photos of the girl as he had promised INSTEAD of raping her? Isn't it possible the young girl might have actually had a career? Mr. Polanski stole many things from his victim, he didn't just steal her childhood, he also stole her dreams even as he lived out his own, and I believe Mr. Polansky should do jail time as a result.

I'M SO MAD ABOUT HEALTHCARE I'M GOING TO SCREAM UNTIL I'M BLUE IN THE FACE !!!

Tee hee hee hee. I couldn't resist that headline, but since I just put up an article on DailyPUMA, I thought I'd put it here, on Daily-PUMA.

I am actually grateful that a lot of people are riled up, on both sides. I just hope we aren't getting distracted from other big issues like letting Jamie Dimon of Chase Bank get a free ride even as he appears to be purposely slowing down local economies with horrible banking practices and policies.

The TEN DOLLAR CHASE BANK CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PROTEST CHALLENGE by MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN JOE.

The TEN DOLLAR CHASE BANK CREDIT CARD PAYMENT PROTEST CHALLENGE by MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN JOE.

Posted using ShareThis

Chase Bank Protest Explained, why the 2% to 5% monthly minimum payment increase is just so wrong.

One columnist mistakenly suggested that credit card debtors "Start paying off cards with the highest balance first". What they probably meant to say was, "pay off cards with the highest interest rate first."

Chase bank is forcing two million customers with low interest, life of the loan credit card debt to pay an additional 150% each month above and beyond what they are already paying. If the customer cannot afford the higher payment, they lose their low interest rate.

If the customer does make the higher payment, it just means they can't pay down their higher rate interest cards as quickly, causing their outstanding high interest rate debts to increase faster than the paying down of their lower interest rate cards with the 5% monthly minimum payment requirement.

What makes Chase Bank's accelerated paydown mandate that will affect over 2 million of their most loyal, never late paying credit card customers so calamitous is it will cause total loss in savings each and every month of between 100 to 500 million dollars! EVERY MONTH!

Chase Bank has been trying to spin their consumer credit card bait and switch swindle as tough love when it is nothing more than paper violence that we are told is being done for our own good.

Additionally, Chase Bank makes their banking competition look bad as they jump to the front of the line and grab a significantly bigger piece of less available consumer spending money that was meant for the entire credit card industry, not just Chase Bank.

Please fight back, this may be one of the biggest economic swindles ever perpetrated in modern times and it is being done in such an open and arrogant manner by a group of Chase Bank executive board members who are so out of touch that the president of Chase Bank told fourth graders they could earn 10% on a savings account even as Chase Bank robs their parents to the tune of .01 percent earnings on their savings account.

Learn how Chase Bank President Keith Schuck glibly misled a class of 4th graders about how much savings accounts earn.

Read over a thousand letters of desperation against Chase Bank that are still being written to consumer affairs dot org

Please join the Chase Bank protest, if Chase Bank succeeds in their misguided yet lethal attempt to raise monthly minimum payment on over 2 million of their on time, never late customers, the other banks will follow.

What makes Chase Bank's plan so evil is they are not even allowing an OPT OUT option, something banks almost always allow.

BLOGGERS AGAINST CHASE BANK

Daily-PROTEST.com

Change in Terms.com

PLEASE JOIN MY PROTEST AGAINST THE CREDIT CARD COMPANIES, STARTING WITH CHASE BANK, AT DAILY-PROTEST.COM

I wrote letters to 50 attorneys general in the United States back in 2004 when my GM card raised the monthly minimum payment from 2.0 percent to 2.5% and would not allow me to opt out. It appears they did nothing to protect the consumer when it comes to opting out as now Chase credit card has done the exact same thing, and topped what GM card did by raising the monthly minimum payment by 250% to their best customers while not allowing them to opt out. Please join my worldwide protest against the Credit Card Companies. Daily-Protest.com

Barack Obama is NOT a Natural Born citizen. Gasp, I never thought I'd write that.

Even though I am involved with DailyPUMA, I have been one of those PUMA's who thought the whole Barack Obama Citizenship issue was a non issue. I was convinced that since Barack Obama was born on US soil, he IS A US CITIZEN. I had no idea what natural born citizen meant, I thought it was just some foofy phrase full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

But then I read the wikipedia natural born citizen, entry. It took me a few readings spread out over a couple of days for me to understand what natural born citizen meant. Our founding FATHERS (with my apologies to those of American Indian descent) did not want american born citizens eligible to become president if their parents (actually just the father) were not at the very least naturalized citizens of the United States. A child born to foreigners on American soil would still be a naturalized citizen, but the child would not be a natural born citizen, and therefore not eligible to be either president or vice-president. Should this child grow up and have children with another US citizen, those children would be natural born. This is all very logical. Natural Born means the birth is a natural result of two naturalized citizens living in the United States and then having a child.

But what if only one parent is a Naturalized US citizen? Does it matter which parent is a naturalized US citizen when it comes to determining if a child born on US soil or territories is either a naturalized citizen, or, a natural born citizen? According to the World Book 1962 edition, Before 1922, a women's citizenship usually changed with that of her husband. Ergo, the founding Fathers were referring to the father being a Naturalized US citizen for his son or daughter to be a natural born citizen.

Our Founding FATHERS didn't seem to think that women were completely equal to men when the constitution was established. Our Founding FATHERS accepted slavery and did not allow slaves or women the right to vote, once again a sign they very protective of who could vote on important issues such as the presidential race.

Wikipedia presents an interesting case study...

Chester A. Arthur (1829-1886), 21st president of the United States, might have been born in Canada.[21] This was never demonstrated by his political opponents, although they raised the objection during his vice-presidential campaign. He was born to a U.S.-citizen mother and a father from Ireland who was eventually naturalized as a U.S. citizen. Arthur was sworn in as president when President Garfield died after being shot.

The key to this passage is "a father from Ireland who was eventually naturalized as a U.S. citizen. Even though the mother was already a US naturalized citizen, it wasn't until Garfield's father became naturalized that Chester Arthur could lay claim to being a natural born citizen.

If Chester Arthur was born in the United States, but his father had never become a US citizen, Chester Arthur would NOT have been eligible to BE (not run for, but be) either president or vice president of the United States irrespective of his mother's citizenship. While objections were raised over where Chester Arthur was born, the biggest issue appears to be establishing who the heck his father's allegiance/citizenship was with. This is key to the entire issue. If Dad's citizenship matters in determining natural born status for Chester Arthur, then it matters when defining Barack Obama's citizen status as well. Don't think for a minute that if a foreigner came to America, implanted his seed in an american female naturalized citizen, and then left after a couple of years, that our founding FATHERS would consider that child a natural born citizen. The child would be a naturalized citizen, but not a natural born citizen.

Otherwise, were Osama Bin Laden to sneak into the U.S. and impregnant a US naturalized female, the child could grow up to be president one day, that's why the natural born citizen law was put into effect by our founding fathers.

Barack Obama IS a naturalized citizen, he is NOT a natural born citizen because of his father lack of naturalized citizenship.

Isn't it ironic that in the mid 90's Barack Obama himself appears to have ignored his dying mother so he could fly to Bali to finish his long delayed first book about his sperm donor father, yet now Barack Obama must COMPLETELY depend on his mummy's citizenship in an effort to declare himself a natural born citizen.

Not only did Barack Obama Sr. never become a US citizen, Barack Obama Sr. would eventually become a Kenyan Political consultant, which would absolutely result in Barack Obama NOT being eligible for natural born citizenship, if Barack Obama Sr had already landed that job while Barack Obama was being birthed. Political operatives of other countries CANNOT create a natural born citizen in the United States irrespective of the mothers U.S. natural citizenship, they can however help create a naturalized citizen of the united states.

The Barack Obama "Bro's before Ho's" campaign should be extinguished by the fact that Barack Obama's father was NOT a US citizen and therefore Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen, a fact that should elicit some chuckling from Alice Walker and other politicians whom in the past Barack Obama has managed to have disqualified for technical reasons far less egregious than not being a natural born citizen.

Lets just hope the Supreme Court is not afraid to do the right and constitutionally lawful thing before Barack Obama is sworn into office.

Are there any US presidents whose father was NOT a naturalized U.S. citizen? If there have not been any prior to Barack Obama, than Barack Obama's father would be the first, and would lend credence to the idea that clearly Barack Obama IS a naturalized citizen, he's just NOT a natural born citizen and therefore not elegible to be either president or vice president of the United States of America.